This summer I made some changes to my lifestyle and career direction and as a consequence of those changes I needed a new computer. My existing machine had been a 1.33 GHz 12 PowerBook G4 and the one before that had been a 600 MHz 14 iBook G3.
My PowerBook had been a substantial increase in performance at the time, the G4 being a generation newer and more than twice the frequency, it wasn t hard to choose between it and the iBook of the day for two reasons:
My iBook being 14 and 6 pounds heavy, it was quite the machine to lug around. At the time, I had been lugging it back and forth to class so the prospect of losing a couple inches off the frame and the accompanying 1.4 pounds was quite enticing.
Ultimately when I went to the store with the intent of settling for the MacBook (mostly for monetary reasons) my salesman friend Mark advised me to go for the MacBook Pro. It was a decision I m glad I let myself be talked into.
Things aren t that different today than they were when I bought my PowerBook.
I still need a laptop that s light, and I still want a laptop that is supported for all the features of Mac OS X (and will be for the next release or two).
Chances are that both the MacBook and MacBook Pro will fit that last requirement. Most of the features (2 GB RAM limit, 2.
0 GHz CPU, DVD+/-RW) are the same, in fact the MacBook and MacBook Pro are only separated by a few features besides the video card. The screen, construction and size are the few that matter to me.
To start, the screen on the MacBook has a glossy finish.
This style seems to be all the rage these days with proponents constantly telling me that the glossy screens are brighter, clearer and more colour accurate than the satin finish screens that still ship on the MacBook Pros. I tend to agree with people, that the screens are brighter, clearer and more colour accurate as long as there isn t light shining anywhere near them. I like to work in my living room by big open windows and in coffee shops and outside under trees.
In all of these situations there is a lot of light and a lot of glare and a lot of reflection off those glossy screens that renders them near useless, at least for me.
Don t get me wrong, I hope they make an LCD one day that is brighter, clearer and more colour accurate than the current offerings, I just don t think we re there yet.
Another sticking point for me was the fact that the MacBook is made of plastic rather than the metal which encases the MacBook Pro.
It s not that the MacBook feels cheap, indeed compared to most PC laptops it feels incredibly sturdy and incredibly sleek, but compared smooth metal that I ve become used to with my PowerBook the plastic MacBook just seems, well, cheap. Sure, it s a metal frame and it s sturdy as hell, but there is something about the aluminium case of the MacBook pro that just feels better and more professional.
The third and probably most important thing to me when considering laptops is the size.
Not to put to fine a point on it, but I like my portable computers to be portable. This is the reason I ve never seriously considered a PC laptop. Sure, you can get them small, but they often lack features that I want or need.
Apple manages to make laptops that are small without sacrificing all that much in the way of features, and I like that.
My 12 PowerBook was near the perfect size: 4.6 pounds light and fit into a shoulder bag with out much fuss.
Today things are a little different in that I don t need a machine to be quite that small anymore, but more to the point the MacBook doesn t offer as significant a drop in size and weight over the MacBook Pro anymore: just under half a pound (vs. almost a pound before) and only an inch less wide and deep (vs. a couple inches narrower before).
So while the MacBook Pro is a tad smaller and lighter, it isn t the major selling point that it once was.
The one feature that really sets the MacBook and MacBook pro apart but isn t of major concern to me, is the video card. The MacBook features an integrated Intel video card with shared memory while the MacBook Pro features a powerful ATI standalone card**.
But, even knowing all this, I had still gone into the store with the intention of leaving with a black MacBook. I was going to settle, and that wasn t sitting well with me. Luckily, Mark is a pretty good salesman and even more luckily for me he had a deal that I couldn t resist.
So instead of leaving the store with a shiny new black MacBook I left with a 2.0 GHz MacBook Pro with a 100 GB hard drive and 1 GB of RAM (which I upgraded to 2 GB almost right away, but that s another article).
The appearance of the MacBook Pro is pretty much exactly the same as the previous generation of PowerBooks.
Aluminum case, rounded edges, ports on either side. Compared to my 12 PowerBook though, it feels much more solid. I am not sure exactly what it is but as I mentioned previously this machine just feels like it s put together better.
There is little or no flex in the case when I pick it up and the aluminum has a smooth, sleek feel to it that somehow my PowerBook lacked (or maybe it was just the 18 months of my hands resting on the PowerBook).
Aside from how it s put together though, the machine just looks cool. Everything from the way the Apple lights up on the back (which is more evenly lit than my PowerBook was) to the backlit keyboard (which looks a hell of a lot cooler in practice in a dark room than it ever did on a showroom floor).
Indeed, the MacBook Pro is every bit the head turner that the PowerBooks were before it.
On the sides of the machine, as per usual, is where the ports are. The mere fact that the ports are on the side is one of the many little things that has always had me convinced that Apple thinks a lot harder about what they re doing then most other manufacturers.
Putting the ports on the side instead of the back makes them easier to access and simply makes more sense than having them in the back as the Titanium PowerBooks did and many PC laptops still do today. Many PC manufacturers have started putting ports on the side as well, but they generally speaking still have important ports like the power connector at the back which I find annoying and inconvenient.
The MacBook Pro 15 lost the FireWire 800 featured on the 15 PowerBook, and I m sure irked some people but I haven t missed it since neither my 12 PowerBook nor my Windows machine has one either.
If I had to complain about the ports I might say that this machine could do with a third or even fourth USB port, but it s not a major issue.
Really though, the port worth talking about is the MagSafe power connector. I ve only had this machine for a few weeks but the MagSafe connector has saved my ass no fewer than three times.
I know you re probably thinking what the hell kind of moron is this guy? Well, I m the kind who just moved into a new space and has a mess of cables that get caught on chair wheels, feet, and boxes falling over. My PowerBook had sustained damage to the case where someone tripping on a cable brought the whole thing down off the surface it was sitting on so to say I appreciate the MagSafe connector is a bit of an understatement.
Realistically it is an incredily simple little feature but it s just one more thing that highlights just how much the hardware design team at Apple pays attention.
The 15 screen on on my MacBook Pro is bright and sharp, and while I do miss the size of my 12 PowerBook I must confess that I m now unsure how exactly I got by with only a 1024 x 768 pixel display for the last five years (iBook and PowerBook). The bigger, wider display has increased my productivity in the last two months by a factor of about a million.
Well, it s not like I can really tell.
The keyboard is relatively unchanged from my PowerBook (or even the iBook before it) except that it s backlit and it feels a little tighter. I haven t had a chance to play with the new style keyboard on the MacBook, but I am accustomed to this one so to me it s no big deal.
I will say though that the backlit keyboard, which I d never before seen in action anywhere other than a showroom floor, is incredibly cool, and the photocell in the machine responds reasonably well when the room gets dark in automatically turning on the backlighting. My only complaints about it are that when the backlighting comes on I prefer it to be on 100% all the time rather than the variable rate that the computer calculates, and that sometimes the photocell gets a little bit confused in low light situations and it ends up turning the backlighting on and off and on again (and for those of you who are about to tell me, I already know about the keyboard buttons that control it).
In short, the outside of this is a beautiful and incredibly functional computer which boasts a few very nice feature updates over its predecessors (as in both the PowerBooks that came before it and my previous machines).
The Core Duo processor that powers the MacBook Pro represents a substantial increase in performance over the G4 in my PowerBook, but unless you re living under a rock (or in denial) you already knew that. But what would an article on Geek Patrol be if I didn t use it to pimp out ?
I Geekbenched my PowerBook G4 and my MacBook Pro and also found a G3 machine equivalent to my iBook (which yes, I still own but died just over a year ago) in the ***.
Core Duo vs. G4 vs. G3 performance graph.
Click image for bigger
When I upgraded from my iBook to my PowerBook, you can see that represented just over a 100% increase in performance. At the time it was great, but in retrospect the three year gap between my iBook and PowerBook should have represented a much greater increase in performance. Doubling the performance is a lot, but not when you consider the amount of time past and the fact that the PowerBook was only about double the frequency.
For contrast, there was only 18 months between my PowerBook and my MacBook Pro and that upgrade represented a nearly 200% increase in performance with only a (roughly) 50% increase in CPU frequency.
The only thing holding this machine back now is that some of the apps I use all the time (ie: Adobe Photoshop) still aren t universal and likely won t be for some time, but even that is not as big a concern as it could be.
Rosetta performance graph.
Click image for bigger
Even running non-native code, the Core Duo performs almost 50% better than my G4 did, and scores just under our 1.6 GHz G5 baseline result. In other words, I m still seeing a respectable performance gain over my old machine and that ain t bad.
Issues: Known, silly and Otherwise
So far my MacBook Pro has been basically issue free. Some programs run slow but I am sure that has more to do with those programs (ie: the non-universal ones) than anything else because most programs run blazingly fast.It does get hot but this honestly isn t surprising to me.
This is my third Apple laptop and the third one that gets hot enough that it isn t comfortable to use directly on my lap when it really gets going. The fan controller does seem to work a little more efficiently than it did in either of my previous machines; where the fans in my iBook and PowerBook rarely came on and when they did they did at full tilt, the fans in my MacBook Pro come on relatively often but at reduced speeds cycling up and down again as needed. As I understand it this is how my PowerBook was supposed to work but never did (even after the motherboard was replaced because the first fan controller died).
There is one issue that has cropped up which is purely cosmetic: the paint directly below the keyboard can be easily scratched off and is now a touch patchy. Now, I buy computers to use and not to look at so I personally don t really care about paint scratching there. I will probably scratch the remaineder of the paint off that thin little strip and it should end up looking pretty much the same as it did before except a little bit shinier, in contrast to the slick matte finish of the rest of the machine that we ve all come to know and love.
The area beneath the keyboard on my MacBook Pro with the spots where the paint scratched off highlighted. Click image for bigger
The last, and biggest, issue I have with the MacBook Pro is the lack of a dial up modem. Now, this isn t a huge issue really because I spent most of my time in Vancouver and in Vancouver I have high speed internet almost everywhere I go.
I do spend time in places other than the city though, and some of those places still only have dial up internet.
I know you can get an external USB modem for $60 CDN, but it seems somehow premature for a modem to not be included in a laptop. Say what you will about desktop machines, but portable machines are meant to go places and not everywhere has the best access to the internet.
Feel free to dredge up arguments about the iMac and the decline of the floppy disk, but in my mind there is a difference between an antiquated storage medium that is barely big enough to hold the files that are being passed around and the antiquated networking method that s still the only way to get online in the boondocks some of us have to visit.
I ve been using this machine for over a month full time now and so far I freaking love it. Say what you will about Rev A hardware from Apple, but despite the very minor problems mentioned above this machine has been rock solid for me in basically every way.
My only concern really is that Apple might replace the Core Duo CPU with a Merom Core 2 Duo CPU sooner than later and that might sting a little bit; the performance difference aside, the jump to a fully 64 bit CPU would be a nice addition to the other features that make this machine future proof. Realistically I doubt it ll be an issue though, as I m sure this machine will last me well into the future. In fact I bet it will last me longer than the 18 months my PowerBook did.
In closing, the 15 MacBook Pro is a fantastic computer and despite the threat of upcoming changes and the fact that I spent more than I originally intended to, it is a purchase I don t think I ll ever regret.
* I have a desktop PC I use for gaming and such.
** Aside: since ATI and AMD recently merged like two hippos in heat, will we continue to see ATI cards in Intel powered Macs?
I ve no idea, but it s worth thinking about.
*** The iMac G3 I found isn t exactly the same machine as my iBook G3 but it is the same CPU, the same bus speed and almost the same amount of RAM (my iBook had 640 MB vs. this iMac with 512 MB, but either way Geekbench only uses 100 MB).
In other words, it s not the same machine but it s close enough for the purposes of this article.
Unless you live under a rock (or don t live on the internet as some of us do) you know that Apple held an event today and released a bunch of new toys to we, the seething roaring shouting masses. Here is a quick rundown of what s come out.
Version 7 of Apples flagship iApp includes a bunch of new whiz bang features, most of which are pretty cool. Here are my impressions in no particular order.
The updated iTunes icon.
The icon: It s blue again. Not a huge deal, but as far as I remember this is the first time there has been a major iTunes release without a completely new colour (and no, iTunes 6 was not a major release).
art for your songs.
My results with this have been hit or miss so far. It seems to take a long time and even then it doesn t get everything. For now I ll stick to on my PC and just wing it on the Mac.
CoverFlow: Nifty new way to browse your music by its cover art. Cool looking if a bit slow loading some of the art.
Gapless playback: All I can say is that it s about fucking time.
Kind of like vaults in Aperture.
I haven t tried it yet, but here s hoping that unlike Aperture vaults this works over a network.
Higher resolution videos: Videos are now encoded at 640 x 480 instead of 320 x 240.
Cool, and leads into the next point:
Movies: You can buy movies on the iTunes Music Store now.
Sounds cool, but I ll likely stick to DVDs. Movies/Videos are now encoded at 4x the resolution that they were previously though, which makes it such that I might actually look at it as an option.
already bought all the PopCap games on Steam, and I sincerely doubt the Steam versions are going to get me licenses for my iPod anytime this eon.
iPod syncing across multiple computers: See comment regarding Gapless Playback.
Playback via multiple speakers: Probably my favourite new feature, but it doesn t even You know the little drop down menu you can use to select whether you want to use local speakers or AirTunes speakers?
Now you can select both and it plays back in sync through both. It s so very cool. Now I can fill my house with music.
Imagine this feature for parties! You can have music blaring everywhere all at the same time!
I haven t had a chance to see if this works for multiple AirTunes set ups yet (because I only have one AirPort Express) but if I find out that it does I ll likely get another AirPort Express just because of it.
rather than the iApps. New buttons scroll bars and library organization are all well and good (I don t mind it but I m sure some of you do), but I wonder how long until we get a consistent interface across the iLife suite? That d be super.
There is also a new list view for music which groups music with its album art which I quite like.
We also were treated to new iPods today, too.
The full-sized iPod now comes in at 30 GB or 80 GB, with the ability to play the new iPod games, gapless playback support, and longer battery life (14 hours on the 30 GB, 20 hours on the 80 GB).
No word yet on whether older 5G iPods are going to be updated for the higher resolution videos or the games. The 30 GB model comes in at $250 USD ($300 CDN) while the 80 GB model is priced at $349 USD ($399 CDN).
The iPod nano is now in its second generation and now comes in three sizes: 2 GB, 4 GB and 8 GB.
The case has also seen a significant change, now made from aluminum and resembling a smaller, thinner iPod mini and sporting different colours. The 2 GB model is priced at $149 USD ($169 CDN) and comes in silver, the 4 GB model is priced at $199 USD ($229 CDN) and comes in silver, green, blue and pink, and the new top end 8 GB model is priced at $249 USD ($299 CDN) and comes only in black.
The new nano also comes with an increased battery life, up to 24 hours (which is an increase from the previous generations 14 hours or even the mini which had 18 hours).
I was kind of surprised to see the nano looking so much like the mini did, but at the same time it isn t something I m going to complain about. Apple s not really known for regressing in terms of industrial design, but I always preferred the look of the mini to that of the nano.
The new iPod shuffle is amazing.
It now comes in one model: 1 GB. It also sports a shiny, tiny, new silver case with a built in clip for your pocket, belt or whatnot. it also boasts a 12 hour battery which isn t that long until you consider the size of the unit which is as I previously mentioned, shiny.
In all seriousness, the new iPod shuffle is the most impressive of the lot and comes in at $79 USD ($89 CDN).
Last but certainly not least Apple also announced a new set top media playing box so you can watch or listen to your iTunes content on a television set. There aren t a lot of details yet, but it outputs video via HDMI or Component (RGB), audio by optical or RCA, can connect to a computer via USB2, ethernet or WiFi and will be priced at $299 USD.
I need to see more details before I make a final judgement about this one. I d like to know what powers the thing and how big the HDD/active memory (which I m sure it ll need for caching) is and so forth. Honestly my first impression is a little bit disappointed though, because in order to use the thing I d have to get a new television or a component switch box, neither of which is an ideal.
I know the video resolution is good, but it s be nice if the thing had S-Video or RCA video too, since most TVs have more of those than anything else.
All in all it s been a pretty good day for Apple. Lots of new products and lots of new press.
I m sure they re going to do well with movies sold via iTunes and I know they re going to sell a lot of new iPods (I m going to grab a 4 GB nano. I m still a little annoyed that movies can t be burned to a playable disc but I m sure that has more to do with Apple toeing the MPAA line than anything else.
While we re fond of here at Geek Patrol, over the last week I ve started using for editing .
While BBEdit treats Markdown as just another plain-text format, TextMate provides all sorts of handy shortcuts and utilities for Markdown (as well as having Markdown syntax highlighting built-in). My favourite utility so far is the Lookup Word on Google and Link , which looks up the current word (or phrase) on Google and generates a link for it. Very handy!
