Not many indie filmmakers can persuade a studio to pony up $35 million for a film described as a love poem to death, but somehow Darren Aronofsky pulled it off. In fact, the Brooklyn-born director of the zero-budget Pi (1998) and the harrowing Requiem for a Dream (2000) seems rather laid-back about his achievement.
I'm sorry it took so long, he jokes while on tour to support The Fountain, a time-jumping sci-fi romance starring Hugh Jackman as, at various times, a conquistador, a cancer scientist and a space traveler; Rachel Weisz plays a wife, a Spanish queen, and finally a ghost.
Spanning three eras, the movie follows conquistador Tom as he fights through the South American jungle to find the mythical Tree of Life; neurosurgeon Tom, in the modern day, as he battles to save his wife from cancer; and spaceman Tom, in the 26th century, racing across the universe in a bubble containing him, the now-dying Tree of Life and his wife's ghost. (See review on Page 35.)
| Indeed, Aronofsky's six-year journey to get The Fountain to the screen comes off as a more benign version of the obsessive quests his antiheroes often pursue. Originally set to begin shooting in late 2002 with Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchett, the production fell apart in a spate of still-unexplained creative differences. When he returned home, he says, One night I couldn't sleep and went into my office. . . . All the books I had read or partly read were sitting across from me, and I said, 'This is in my blood.' I just started writing, and two and a half weeks later it emerged. With Pitt's departure, the budget was lowered from the GDP of a small nation to the relatively paltry $35 million mentioned above. Even the film's climactic space sequences -- done without computer graphics, only old-school techniques -- have a stripped-down quality despite their sound and fury. (In place of computer animation to create nebulae and dark matter, Aronofsky relied on a photographic technique that magnifies microscopic reactions in water by hundreds of thousands of times, transforming a dash of yeast or solvent into a swirling backdrop of infinity.) It's very much like a Rubik's cube, where you can solve it in several different ways, but ultimately there's only one solution at the end, he says. ' Still, compared with Requiem for a Dream, with the hyperkinetic editing of its third act, The Fountain comes off as downright funereal. We worked long and hard to create its own language for it, Aronofsky says. The content dictates the film grammar. The same way 'Requiem for a Dream' was when it came out and was viciously attacked. The day after it premiered -- and we had a 10-minute ovation for 'Requiem' -- Variety said I shouldn't be in films, I should be in therapy. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Read more on by www.washingtonpost.com. All rights reserved.
Related news
Post comments
|
