greeklish.org :: politics
Fanny More  |  by www.greeklish.org. All rights reserved. 21.04 | 14:50

Komsomol bannerI have my collection of " " artwork and related memorabilia in my home library. I have also mentioned the shortage or make that the virtual absence — of wall space in the area as well. In fact, I had pretty much figured that my days of acquiring large items were pretty much over because most of my wall space is covered by items large and small.

Add to this that I have huge bookcases stacked to maximum capacity as well as my comic book collection in the room as well and one can probably appreciate just how stuffed this room has become. However, I recently came upon an item on eBay that I just couldn't pass up despite its size and my relative shortage of display space. The item was banner which was previously owned by the district Council.

The banner commemorates the 50th anniversary of Komsomol. I was really, really enamored with the item and after a bit of consideration (and a bit of discussion with my incredibly gracious "better half"), I purchased the banner and waited with excitement to receive it in the mail. The asking price for the item was a rather tidy sum (by my standards, anyway), but the banner seems to me to have quite a bit of historical value given the importance of Leningrad in the history of the USSR and considering the pivotal events of 1968 in the history of the world socialist movement.

Now, the dimensions were included in the listing, but for some reason, 4 feet by 5 feet really didn't seem that big to me. But tonight, as I unpacked the item from its mailer, the picture became a bit clearer to me: Basically, I have no space for this piece — At least not with the current configuration of the room, anyway. Argh!

So there is work to be done...

The fact of the matter is that I am going to have to get creative in how I display his item. It is just too amazing to be unappreciated or to be displayed haphazardly. The piece is a two-sided banner made of a very heavy material and the text is embroidered.

The text on one side reads: "Workers of all countries, unite! 1918-1968 Leningrad Komsomol Committee" and on the other side it says "For significant success in the celebration of 50th Anniversary of Komsomol." The banner is really a beautiful piece and it is clean and virtually free of all blemishes.

It could, I think, easily end up in a museum someday. But for now, I plan to hang the banner vertically from some hooks in the ceiling. One end of the flag includes a sleeve which should fit a curtain rod nicely and I will use some small lengths of chain to connect the rod to the ceiling hooks.

This will be a mini-project of sorts for me which should be interesting considering that I am not that handy. Nevertheless, I am hoping the end result will be impressive. I might post a picture of the finished display when it's all put together.


The 90-page report comments on widely discussed issues such as the growing economic importance of India and China, the militarisation of space, and even what it calls "declining news quality" with the rise of "internet-enabled, citizen-journalists" and pressure to release stories "at the expense of facts". It includes other, some frightening, some reassuring, potential developments that are not so often discussed. [ ]

According to the study, one of the biggest threats ahead is the resurgence of Marxism as a viable political movement with newfound popular appeal:

"The middle classes could become a revolutionary class, taking the role envisaged for the proletariat by Marx," says the report.

The thesis is based on a growing gap between the middle classes and the super-rich on one hand and an urban under-class threatening social order: "The world's middle classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest". Marxism could also be revived, it says, because of global inequality. An increased trend towards moral relativism and pragmatic values will encourage people to seek the "sanctuary provided by more rigid belief systems, including religious orthodoxy and doctrinaire political ideologies, such as popularism and Marxism".



I would have never thought that the UK Ministry of Defence would publicly acknowledge the validity of , but there you have it! Leave it to the military-industrial complex to frame the prospective resolution of "global inequities" as a bad thing that must be stopped at all costs, eh?

Here's my favorite part:

By 2035, an implantable "information chip" could be wired directly to the brain.

A growing pervasiveness of information communications technology will enable states, terrorists or criminals, to mobilise "flashmobs", challenging security forces to match this potential agility coupled with an ability to concentrate forces quickly in a small area.


Now, because I am a longtime comic book reader, this part of the story rang a bell (or maybe it was an implantable information chip in my brain) and I remembered one of my favorite issues of Captain America from many, many years ago. It was Captain America #193 (January 1976), to be specific and it was one of the first comics I ever acquired for my collection.

Back in the early 1980's, my folks bought me a big stack of Marvel and DC books from the mid 1970's and #193 one of a handful of Captain America issues in the lot. This particular story was about a fantastic new weapon called "madbomb" that was used by an underground terrorist group to drive inhabitants of small towns and cities so insane with murderous rage that they would be driven to destroy everything in their midst, including themselves. I've scanned a bit from this issue to assist in my brief overview of the tale.

In the panels below, a government-type fellow (who introduces himself as "Henny" and bares a striking resemblance to Henry Kissinger) briefs Cap and Falcon on the deadly potential of the madbomb:



But it gets better...

At the issue's cliffhanger ending, "Henny" reveals that mysterious terrorist group possesses a madbomb powerful enough to drive the entire U.S. population insane.

And — get this — the detonation of the device is set to coincide with...

(pause for dramatic effect)...

the U.S. Bicentennial!

(gasp!) Now, in the interest of accuracy, it is true that madbomb is a single, stationary device and in this regard it is slightly different from the implantable microchip idea, but the principle is roughly the same. The "Madbomb" storyline ran for seven issues and for many, many years, #193 was the only issue from the series that I had (I re-read it so much as a kid that it's virtually in tatters now), but I am sure it's safe to assume that Cap and Falcon kicked major terrorist ass by the end of the tale.

So, while the idea of a madbomb-like device is more or less straight out of the comics, it's relatively easy to conclude that such a plot is ultimately flawed from a number of angles.

Captain America 193I mean, it's an easily defeatable scheme after all..

.It's apparent that the all the British need to defeat the "flashmob" menace is Henry Kissinger and a couple of super heroes. Besides, even though Cap and Falcon are fictional characters, Henry Kissinger is all too real.

..and very effective at that.

If you don't want to take my word for it, just ask . And there's another bright side to all this: recently did a show in which they proved that hypnotism can't be used to make unwilling victims commit crimes, assaults and the like. If that holds true for "implantable information chip" technology, then we're all safe for now.

Whew!

Perhaps the most interesting thing here is that if anyone has the capability to build fantastic super-weapons like cannons and mind-control implants, it's the ruling-class elites and defense ministries of the world. When is someone going to write a study predicting what these folks have in store for the rest of us?

And what do you think the reaction from the top echelons would be if the world's working people did produce such a document — that is, a study predicting wide scale repression of the world's masses by ruling elites through extreme force, terrorism, intimidation and psychological warfare? Why, they would surely dismiss it as little more that "conspiracy theory" propaganda from the radical left. But if you pick up a (and read between the lines a bit), you might be keen enough to see that it's already happened, time and again.

And from there, it's not do difficult to write your own predictions for the future.

See you when the madbomb hits!


By the way.

..To all you regular readers.

..I've been a bit under the weather as of late, so my writing time has taken a bit of a hit.

But part 3 of the Rush Objectivism series is forthcoming.

It is a sin to write this. It is a sin to think words no others think and to put them down upon a paper no others are to see.

It is base and evil. It is as if we were speaking alone to no ears but our own. And we know well that there is no transgression blacker than to do or think alone.

We have broken the laws. The laws say that men may not write unless the Council of Vocations bid them so. May we be forgiven!



Equality 7-2521 from Ayn Rand's book Anthem



My folks had a couple of paperback copies of Ayn Rand books in the house when I was a kid. I remember seeing paperback copies of and on the high shelves in the high bookshelves of our home library. My first real exposure to the work of Ayn Rand was in 1990 during my senior year of high school.

I was taking a miserable course called "Contemporary Issues in Literature" or something like that. It is something of a miracle that I passed the course given my complete lack of enthusiasm for most things at that point in time. It was the first class of the day and it is absolutely the truth when I say that I spent much of this class catching up on my beauty sleep.

Most of our class time was spent doing something that I think was called "sustained silent reading." This basically meant that the teacher really didn't have to teach that much. We were assigned a number of books to read that year and I don't mind saying that I really didn't appreciate most of them.

was really good, but I hated the way the teacher had tried to explain and analyze the book. I didn't care how many times she had read the book — I felt like I knew more about Holden Caulfield than she did! We read , which I thought was fairly depressing and whiny at the time.

Then we read , which was something of a Cold War armageddon-ish yarn (I had already read Steven King's The Stand a few years before and that was pretty much the definitive apocalyptic tale in my mind). Somewhere in there, we were supposed to read Solzhenitsyn's , but I must confess that I never really got around to that one. But I did read by Ayn Rand and I was really taken by it.

I was 17 years old and disenchanted with almost everything around me...

Was there anything not to like about it back then?
Anthem 1946 Signet cover
Anthem definitely had a futuristic, science fiction feel to it and this certainly caught my interest as I had been enjoying the work of authors like Alan Dean Foster, Ben Bova, and Arthur C. Clarke for most of my high school days.

The politics behind the story weren't completely lost on me, either. I often tell the "baby boomers" that I discuss politics with that I consider myself to be as much of a child of the Cold War as anyone who lived through the Cuban Missile Crisis. By the time I was a kid, we didn't "duck and cover" any more…Our teachers would just tell us in some detail what would happen to all of us if the bomb landed on the local military base.

Fun stuff. Anyway, the point is that the anti-collectivist theme of Anthem was not so objectionable to me after living through eight years of Ronald Reagan. For me, Anthem struck a particular chord in how the character dealt with acute, institutionalized alienation.

Alienation and the struggle for identity were themes that I really identified with at that point in time. It would be much later that I learned a different way of explaining and analyzing alienation as a phenomenon. At the time, I accepted that the needs of the individual were paramount and that collectivism was, as such, highly impractical to say the least.

Some years later, reading my first bit of Guevara would undo all of that line of thinking.

Anthem stuck with me as an outstanding work for some time. I remember telling other people about the magnificence of the book and even returning to the text to look for quotes and information at different points.

Politics weren't so important at the time because, as I noted above, my political beliefs and opinions had already been shaped for me by eight years of Reagan (plus a few years of George HW Bush as well). But despite my favorable opinion of Anthem, I didn't bother to delve much farther into Rand after reading the book. I worked at a library for several years and books by and about Ayn Rand passed through my hands with fleeting interest.

I especially remember the day we received a new book featuring a critique of Rand's life and work. The cover was orange and it featured a picture of Rand wearing a huge brooch in the shape of a dollar sign. The contents described Rand as a champion of capitalism which was new information to me (maybe I should have paid more attention in my literature class).

I was just starting to become interested in politics by that point and I was beginning to put some pieces together. I was drawn to the liberal end of the political spectrum by the start of my undergraduate years and I began to look at Rand with some skepticism. I was still interested, though.

It would be a while before I read much on Objectivism and Randian thought , but basic tenets such as Rand's emphasis on logic and reason and her rejection of metaphysics and religion seemed largely agreeable to me. Over the years I read a little more by Rand, including a collection called . Thomai bought a super-deluxe edition of Atlas Shrugged as a gift for me one Christmas, but I am sorry to say that to date I have not succeeded in putting so much as a dent in it.


album coverSo what about music? I started my high school years listening to The Beatles and Creedence Clearwater Revival.

By the time I started college, I had moved on to The Misfits and Sex Pistols. But certain tastes, like Kiss and Rush remained constant throughout these years. I think my interest in Rush picked up considerable around my junior year in high school after I rented a VHS copy of " .

" I made a copy of the video, adding it an eclectic VHS mix tape that included the videos " " and the Exodus/Slayer/Venom show " " (I still love Venom!..

.You just can't outgrow some things no matter how crazy they are!) Anyway, seeing the Rush concert video motivated me to pick up some of the studio albums that had featured songs from the live show.

" " and " " included some of my favorites like " ," " " and " ." " " was also featured on "Exit..

.Stage Left" and I really enjoyed the song with all its drama and imagery, although I found the message behind the lyrics to be somewhat perplexing. I would later come to learn that "The Trees" as well as "Closer to the Heart" were credited as featuring "Randian themes" by some.

Towards the end of high school, I picked up a copy of " ." I remember seeing television commercials for "Signals" when it was first released back in 1982. I was 9 years old back then and I thought the dog and fire hydrant scene on the cover was funny.

Almost 10 years later, I was able to appreciate the album it at another level.

Rush stuck with me (or maybe I should say that I stuck with Rush) as I entered college. By this point, I had become interested in a lot of competing genres and styles and I think it was around this time that I started listening to music in cycles.

By the time " " had come out, I had been away from Rush for a while. I bought a second-hand copy on cassette one night during one night during one of the "long, lonely summers" before I met Thomai. This was one of the summers before we had started to date, and it was a period in which I was very uncertain of what I was going to do and where I would go in life.

I still remember the night rather well. I remember walking to the car and putting the tape in the car's tape deck. It was kind of late and I was alone.

I remember driving down what seemed like a very dark road listening to " ," the opening track from the album. I couldn't help but identify with the lyrics as song poured out of the speakers and filled the air around me:

When we are young
Wandering the face of the earth
Wondering what our dreams might be worth
Learning that we're only immortal —
For a limited time I have noticed that my interests tend to run in cycles. I have a lot of interests and a lot of "favorites.

" Every so often, I might read a whole lot on one particular subject and then, as quickly as my interest builds I shift to another topic. I am like this with Russian and Chinese history, reading a spate of books on one of these subjects over the course of weeks to months, then shifting back to the other, maybe picking up another unrelated interest in between and then returning back to Russian or Chinese history for a stretch. I am the same with comics, television, sports and .

I have never really looked for a pattern or a relationship to seasons or events in my life...

It's just something I have just come to accept. I am especially this way when it comes to music. I will often go for several weeks concentrating on work by one artist or another until my interest shifts to something else.

But as quickly as the tide rolls in, it rolls out again and I'm on to something else. For many, many years now, has been a recurring favorite in my listening rotation. About two or three times a year, I enjoy a steady diet of Rush material, from their earliest days through some of their more recent fare.

If I made a soundtrack for a movie about my life, there would certainly be a few Rush songs in there representing some of the better moments thus far. But as much as I have loved this music over the years, I have grown to have some reservations regarding the philosophy which apparently guides the band. Much of this has come in the last decade or so as I have grown older and more politically aware.

Since I am currently in the midst of my semiannual Rush fixation, I thought this might be as good of a time as any to reflect a little on my affection for the music and my thoughts on the politics behind the band. I am sure I don't have the time or patience to write a thorough exposition and analysis of the philosophical underpinnings of this rock and roll icon. I'm not up to writing an amateur dissertation here — I'm just waxing philosophical.

Think of it as "blogging out loud." The first Rush song I ever listened to — and I mean really listened to — was "Tom Sawyer." I'm sure that's probably true for a lot of people.

I was about 13 or 14 and I taped a bunch of songs off the radio, most of which were apparently rather forgettable. I think I might have been sick and I was home from school on a weekday. I listened to the tape at least once a day for a really long time and the only songs that I really recall from that particular mix were "Tom Sawyer" and "Break on Through" by The Doors (the latter song would lead to a fascination with the doors a short time later).

I mean, I am sure I had heard a lot of Rush before that particular day, but to have finally captured a song off the radio was kind of a big deal for me back then. I was really taken by the music itself ("prog rock" is what they call it, I guess) and the lyrics — the meaning of which were not really clear to me back then (and still aren't today) — were equally captivating. album coverEventually, I got around to buying " " on cassette and soon after, I got " " for $4.99 from the local K-Mart. In the spirit of full disclosure (and unnecessary detail), I will confess that my mom actually bought it for me and that I had promised to pay her back for it, but I never did and she seemed to forget about the debt after a relatively short time.

I guess I still owe her five bucks. Anyway, I still remember looking at the big owl on the cover of "Fly by Night" as I fiddled and fumbled with the removal of the long, plastic anti-theft casing. Whenever I bought tapes back then, I would usually spend about 20 minutes trying to pry the plastic casing off with a screwdriver before I realized that a wire-cutter would get the job done a lot faster.

"Fly by Night" was such a great album. It was years before I appreciated the grandeur of "By-Tor and the Snow Dog," (which happened after I finally listened to the live version on " " at the repeated urging of a coworker from one of my part-time jobs while I was in high school) but most of the other tracks made strong impressions on me almost immediately. I was already familiar with the title track from one of the local "album rock" (that's what they used to call "classic rock") stations and that was all well and good, but "Anthem" (more on the significance of the song's title later) and "In the End" were almost instant favorites of mine.

I remember playing "Anthem" for my dad on the way to school one morning and he was less than impressed. That's okay..

.I gues it's not exactly cool for your parents to like your music. Years later, I had Thomai over to my house on a date and I recall sitting in my room and playing "In the End" for her on my electric guitar. I played the soft part intro and then I stood on a chair and turned on the distortion to belt out the heavy part.

She was very impressed. She is, I think, the only person whom I have ever truly impressed with my guitar playing. I wonder if she still remembers that night.

.. album coverAnd then there was " .

" This album changed everything in a big way. I don't remember exactly when I bought it, but I do clearly recall listening to it back when I was working a part-time job at a fast food restaurant, so I would have been 16 or so at the time. I was already familiar with lengthy, over-the-top masterpieces thanks to Led Zeppelin albums like " " and " .

" The fact that Zeppelin was able to fill an entire side of " " with just one song, a live version of "Dazed and Confused," had really impressed me. But the Rush song "2112" — lasting a full 20 minutes and 33 seconds and comprising the entire first side of that album — really blew my mind. Of course, this particular song was a story; a true epic tale for the ages.

Most people who are familiar with the album know the gist of story: A sterile and bland future world ruled by an authoritarian clique is rocked with controversy when a young man discovers a long-forgotten relic. The relic is a guitar which the man tunes and plays happily. In his excitement, he takes the guitar before the rulers and attempts to show them how the music from the guitar can change the world for the better.

The rulers dismiss the man and his discovery, and in doing so they dash his dreams for a happy life. Deciding that he cannot live in such a cruel heartless world, the man commits suicide. A planetary war ensues in which the rule of the clique is threatened and the final act, while somewhat ambiguous, leaves plenty of room for the listener's imagination to take it from there.

At 16 years old, much of the political overtones were lost on me. The theme of the rebellious spirit striking out against feelings of alienation and repression was understandably appealing to me as an angst-filled teenager. The music on the album was a fantastic range of heavy rock, ballad-like interludes and musical narratives.

Even these days, I still listen to "2112" quite often. In fact, "Soliloquy/Grand Finale" is still one of my favorite rock pieces of all time. My first copy of "2112" was a cassette and the older Rush tapes didn't include the full liner notes that were available on LP versions.

I don't have the old cassette version any more, but I am relatively certain that it didn't have any liner notes at all; just a shot of the main cover image and the track names. It wasn't until many years later that I picked up "2112" on LP from a second hand record store on High Street in Columbus. It was then that I held the full gatefold LP cover in my hands and read the words which had gained Rush so much notoriety from some and heaps of scorn and infamy from others: Spectre 22The full text of Lyubov Kosmodemyanskaya's book is now posted online.

The book is a biography of two Heroes of the Soviet Union, and her brother Alexander Kosmodemyansky (“Shura”), as written by their mother. This non-copyrighted book was originally published in 1953 by Foreign Languages Press (Moscow). All 286 pages of text and photos are now available through our website.



It's taken me quite a while — probably a bit too long — to transcribe the whole book and given the length of time involved, I wish that I could say that the transcription is flawless. I have spent quite a bit of time cleaning up typos and OCR in the text, but I am sure there are some minor errors here and there that will come to my attention as time goes on.

After the returns to , this text will also be added to the Archive's section.

One day Zoya and I were walking along the street, and on the wall of a house we noticed a big placard from which the determined face of a soldier looked at us severely. The keen piercing eyes were looking straight at us, the words printed underneath rang in our ears as if they had been spoken aloud in an urgent voice, "What have you done for the front?" "I can't pass that placard calmly," she said bitterly.

"But you are still young, and you have been to the labour front—that's also work for the country, for the Army." For some minutes we walked along in silence, and suddenly Zoya said in quite a different voice, cheerfully and with an air of finality, "I am lucky. Everything I want comes true.

" "What are you thinking about?" I wanted to ask, and did not. But my heart was heavy with foreboding.

On April 20 I found a letter in the letter box. Shura's field post office number was on the envelope, but the address was not in his handwriting. I stood holding the letter for a long time, afraid to unseal it.

Then I tore open the envelope and read the first lines. The room went dark before my eyes. I drew a deep breath, started reading again, and again could not read on.

Then I gritted my teeth as hard as I could and read to the end. "It is hard for me to write to you. But I beg you to summon all your courage and strength.

Your son, Senior Lieutenant of the Guards Alexander Anatolyevich Kosmodemyansky, died the death of a hero in battle with the German invaders. He gave up his young life for the freedom and independence of our Motherland. "I will say only one thing.

Your son is a hero, and you may be proud of him. He defended his Country honourably, and has proved himself worthy of his sister. "In the fighting for Königsberg on April 6, Alexander Kosmodemyansky's self-propelled gun mount was the first to force a canal thirty metres wide and open fire at the enemy, destroying an artillery battery, blowing up an ammunition dump and killing nearly sixty Hitlerite soldiers and officers.

"On April 8 he was the first to break into the fort of Konigin Luisen, where 350 prisoners were captured together with nine tanks in good condition, 200 lorries and a petrol dump. In the course of the fighting Alexander Kosmodernyansky was promoted from commander of a self-propelled gun mount to battery commander. In spite of his youth he commanded the battery successfully and carried out all battle tasks in exemplary fashion.

"He was killed yesterday in the fighting for the locality of Vierbrudenkrug, west of Königsberg, which was already in our hands. Your son was one of the first to break into Vierbrudenkrug, wiping out nearly forty Hitlerites and crushing four antitank guns. An exploding enemy shell cut short the life of our dear comrade, Alexander Anatolyevich Kosmodemyansky.

"War and death are inseparable, but it is so much more difficult to be reconciled with death on the eve our Victory. "Be courageous. With sincere respect and sympathy, "Lieutenant-Colonel of the Guards Legeza.

" I love to come here, to walk along the dear familiar corridors of my children's school, which now bears Zoya's name. I look into the classrooms. I go up onto the third floor and approach the doors where there is an inscription: "Heroes of the Soviet Union Zoya Kosmodemyanskaya and Shura Kosmodemyansky studied in this classroom.

" I enter this room, where the portraits of my children look down at me from the walls. There is the second desk in the middle row—Zoya used to sit there. Now another girl sits at this desk, and she has Zoya's clear eyes.

And there that desk at the back of the next row—that was Shura's place. The girl who sits there now looks up at me. She is wearing a brown frock with a white collar and black apron, and she has such a grave thoughtful face.

Here is a young woman with a kind, pleasant face coming down the corridor to meet me. She is Katya Andreyeva. She has done what she intended to do; she has become a schoolmistress teaching at her old school, the school where she studied together with Zoya and Shura.

My children's classmates are now engineers, doctors, teachers. They continue the work for the sake of which their comrades gave up their lives. I walk along the familiar corridor.

The door of the library is open. Shelf alter shelf along the walls is full of books, a great number of books. "Before the war we had twenty thousand volumes.

Now we have forty thousand," says Katya to me. I go outside. The school is surrounded with green trees.

There they are, the trees the children planted. And I seem to hear Zoya's voice: "My linden is the third one—remember, Mummy.

Read more on by www.greeklish.org. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Ayn Rand, Henry Kissinger, Captain America, Alexander Anatolyevich, Anatolyevich Kosmodemyansky, Cold War, Tom Sawyer, Soviet Union, Alexander Kosmodemyansky, Alexander Anatolyevich Kosmodemyansky
Related news
  • Womans Health
    Hotty Miss

    (Best Syndication) Although eating low-fat dairy foods may increase infertility risk, the consumption of high-fat ice cream may help women get pregnant. Previous researcher found that women who consumed low-fat dairy increased their risk of infertility...

  • 9:50 PM
    Franky Micklestone

    New Opportunities to Get On TV,Places to Party/ Network with the Stars, As Always Huge Prizes, Awards, Competitions - - UPDATED- Welcome back...

  • siN's Metal News | 'pure METAL news' | SMNnews.com
    Hun Lee

    March 12th, 2007, 9:56 pm With only three weeks till the release of STATIC-X ’s album on April 3, the band wants to give their fans another taste of “ Cannibal” .  ‘Destroyer’ is the second track off of the new album with the raw heavy sound that Wayne S...

  • Irish Rock
    Sam Boyle

    If you're looking for a good time this St. Patrick's Day weekend, look no further than the rock/celtic band...

  • I n d i a P o s t . c o m - Mallika's visa
    Hun Lee

    Mallika Sherawat is currently shooting with Kamal Hassan for his film Dasavatharam. It is said that this will be one of the most expensive films to be made in the country and well, Mallika has added to the budget of the film in her own way...

Post comments
Name
Place
1 + 4 =
Comments