In "Music and Lyrics," Hugh Grant seems like the love child of Elton John and Kiki Dee, but the heart he breaks more often is his own.
That's because, as a refugee from an '80s pop group known for its bubbly lightness, its unbearable lightness of being, he refuses to take himself and his work seriously. He's a pop traitor; he thought he was too good for the music that liberated, then nourished, and all these years later still feeds him.
| So the best thing about "Music and Lyrics," which chronicles the Grant character's resuscitation as a pop force, is its subtext of professionalism. It reveals what all practitioners of the seemingly light and amusing know but never tell you: It's bloody hard work. In that respect, it reminds me a great deal of Meryl Streep's great soliloquy on "cerulean" in "The Devil Wears Prada. " Yes, you can think of it -- "cerulean" as a color, "Don't Go Breaking My Heart" as a song, "The Silence of the Lambs" as a potboiler and so on, any pop icon or even any pop non-icon -- smugly as a joke among the unwashed and the gullible. But if you make your living off it, you ought to treat it like holy writ -- sacred, serious, demanding, a phenomenon that employs the thousands and pleases the millions. If you don't take the pop sensibility seriously, there's no place for you in its world.
But the point is, each needs the other, for love and for music. The other boy has gone on to movie greatness and entertainment imperialism on a grand scale. Grant's Fletcher, by contrast, lives in a decent but hardly palatial apartment in Manhattan and two or three times a month gets his weary old body to a state fair or a supermarket opening where he can just barely muster the energy to propel his reluctant pelvis through a set of the pumps and thrusts that made him hotter than a smokin' radiator back in the '80s. Needless to say, he and his fans have seen better years, harder bodies and livelier pelvi.
It could be his ticket back to the bigs but he's got to do it by Friday, and working with this rude kid doesn't seem to be getting anyone anywhere. Meanwhile, why is the girl watering the plants coming up with better lines? No, it's not a refrain of sheer brilliance like "You say potato, I say po-tah-to, let's call the whole thing off," but then what is? But most of the issues are professional: What do you sacrifice to please a sponsor, in this case a dim girl who wants mainly to undulate her 19-year-old perfect body before the world while playing cymbals mounted on her fingers? She thinks she's some Hindu goddess of destruction, while Alex and Sophie would just like their song sung straight. Where do you draw the line? Where do you compromise? How hard do you fight? Is it better to yield and come back for another day or do you burn the bridges and face failure?
Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Read more on by www.washingtonpost.com. All rights reserved.
Related news
Post comments
|
